61 Comments
Jun 7, 2022Liked by Michael P Senger

I think it's funny that the idea of a man made virus is more dangerous. That is giving more credit than is deserved. But everything you have written makes perfect sense to me. Thank you!

Expand full comment

Remember that the "virus" has never been isolated, the inventor of the PCR test, Kary Mullins, specifically stated that it could not be used to accurately diagnose its presence (he conveniently died about 6 months before the "outbreak"), and over 200 countries locked down within 2 weeks of the "outbreak." It was all scripted. Mike Pompeo is on tape saying during a press conference, "We're going forward with this exercise to make it right," to which Trump can be heard responding to him, "You should have told us." I think we're dealing with electronic pollution (5G, etc), and poisoned food, water, air, and who knows what else. Massive depopulation and totalitarian control are the goal by our psychopathic overlords, the Luciferian globalist NWO elite.

Expand full comment

Thanks for persisting in reporting this. I made a note to get your book when you discussed it previously, but got distracted. This time I ordered it. War with China is inevitable. Very important that everyone understand who we're dealing with. Since the woke US military seems uninterested in defense, China will probably continue to win. My reading plans also include learning mandarin, which we'll need to beg for food when they take over. Maybe it's not too late.

Expand full comment
Jun 12, 2022Liked by Michael P Senger

This is an amazing post in the sense that the "Lab Leak Theory" only served as a convenient distraction for the true evil that the CCP was inflicting on the world. It shames me that it hadn't occurred to me given my personal exploration of the topic, yet it is a remarkably brilliant observation that offers a whole new perspective on this ugly saga. Bravo, Michael Senger.

Expand full comment

RosaryKnight is right. Micheal, it is great that you take apart the lab theory as this has been grating at me for soo long. There are many people who have been fantastic through covid: Bret Weinstein and the PANDA team for instance, but I do wish they would put the virus itself under more scrutiny. I know that many on this side of the fence think the Germ Theory sceptics are a bunch of nutters, but I have listened to the arguments and read many books on the subject and I would like those I respect above, and anyone else with a rational, scientific methodology to get in conversation with those that oppose Germ Theory to get this done and dusted. As far as I'm concerned, with what I have learned, I see nothing other than terrain.

Expand full comment

Discrediting what is deliberate misuse of the PCR test would be the best way to bring this fraud down. All the healthy people quarantined must strongly suspect they were never really ill. It would also call into question the current mass culls of healthy looking birds due to "bird flu", all based on most probably misuse PCR.

Expand full comment

I think all of those Chinese videos of people collapsing on the street, people being dragged out of homes and cars, people committing suicide, the portable incineration trucks burning bodies 24/7, and the massive spray trucks going down the main arteries of the city was intentional for the consumption of the west. it spread fear. couple that with sending hundreds of thousands of CCP implants with some sickness in their bodies around the world to key cities propelled mass formation in the West. Sure we had Event 201. So to me have collusion of mass proportions of East and West joining forces to reset the world--this is beyond madness to understand the sheer size and complexity of what we have seen unfold before us since fall 2019 and launch in 2020.

Expand full comment
Jun 7, 2022·edited Jun 7, 2022

Isn't it somewhat of a false dichotomy to present "Wuhan lab theory" and "wet market theory" as the only two theories that have gained credence?

Quote:

"Currently, there are two politically-popular theories as to how SARS-CoV-2 came about: The Wuhan lab theory and the pangolin, or wet market, theory. "

In the next paragraph quoted, the theory that Covid came from "a lab" seems to be dismissed by conflating it with the theory that Covid specifically came from the Wuhan lab.

Quote:

"As for whether Covid actually came from a lab, the theory’s popularity tends to belie the threadbare evidence in support of it. ... several coronaviruses have been found which are far more genetically similar to SARS-CoV-2 than any that were held at the Wuhan lab;"

But the plausibility that Covid could have come any number of biolabs has already become part of mainstream theory:

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/coronavirus-lab-escape-theory.html

(Nicholson Baker, Jan 2021)

Quote:

"It could have happened in Wuhan, but — because anyone can now “print out” a fully infectious clone of any sequenced disease — it could also have happened at Fort Detrick, or in Texas, or in Italy, or in Rotterdam, or in Wisconsin, or in some other citadel of coronaviral inquiry. No conspiracy — just scientific ambition, and the urge to take exciting risks and make new things, and the fear of terrorism, and the fear of getting sick. Plus a whole lot of government money."

Expand full comment

Apart from the wet market theory, which I did not believe for a second, and the Wuhan lab escape theory I wonder if the military games theory has ever been persued. The military games were held just before the breakout. Some of the military had been part of the john hopkins-bill gates exercise of how to handle a pandemic. Did they work with real virus or was it just a fake? Did anyone test the boys who were involved to see if they got infected? I read that several of the military got sick there. That, of course, would mean that the virus, as Dr. Martin says, originated in an american lab. Was china worried about a fight with america? And was america worried they might be pointed at as the cause of the disaster? The american military holds the patents to most of the virus, so that is a tip !

Expand full comment

From what I recall, there was a significant genetic variation for the earliest spreading European and NY variants that was distinct from any of the sequences that came from Wuhan. Did it come before or after? Were they separately 'seeded?' Was omicron?

Wuhan lab was certainly involved in gain-of-function research on coronavirus, but it doesn't mean they were the only ones. With all that has come out about US funded biolabs and the involvement of figures like Hunter Biden in firms who are supposed to predict emerging diseases, I find US government credibility on the subject of biowarfare very low. The idea that large amounts of money are being spent in 2022 to secure Soviet bioweapons from 30 years ago is patently absurd.

The Chinese were certainly involved in shaping the media atmosphere to promote lockdowns, but I don't think we should forget more than 20 years of pandemic planning scenarios that universally promoted suspension of civil liberties and vaccination. They were always attended by CIA and US media. The Chinese involvement in things like Event 201 came only recently.

Expand full comment

"The Kindle title is not currently available for purchase" why do I keep getting this?

Expand full comment

Firstly, Chinese Intelligence took down the Labs online presence when they took over and sanitised the Wuhan Lab.

Secondly, the 3 days in Oct when there was no cell phone traffic in the Labs vircinity is not nothing.

Thirdly, that the CCP closed China to Wuhan but thousands went from Wuhan into the world particularly Italy & EU and on to USA, is significant.

I don’t think we’ll ever know everything about this unless the “Bat lady” and staff talk. Considering those doctors the CCP has disappeared, I doubt it.

Expand full comment

"might be a supervirus from the Wuhan lab"

- maybe not the one from the Wuhan lab you compared it to, but certainly from _a_ lab.

But see Igor Chudov's substack for looking into funny inserts of genetic sequences into SARS-CoV-2, like gp120 from HIV and some 2018 patented sequence.

He (IIRC) also provided a calculation of the likelihood of this naturally occuring, and that number had a lot of zeroes after the dot.

That would make that bug kinda special, in my understanding of the word.

Expand full comment

"the origin of Covid and the CCP’s motivations in exporting China’s containment policy"

China plays a role but the origins of lockdowns seems to have come about during pandemic simulations. Here is some information about a 2007 paper which didn't lay out the most extreme version but did help create the policy used in 2020.

https://www.aier.org/article/the-2006-origins-of-the-lockdown-idea/

"Their policy would become the basis for government planning and would be used extensively in simulations used to prepare for pandemics, and in a limited way in 2009 during an outbreak of the influenza called H1N1. Then the coronavirus came, and the plan was put to work across the country for the first time."

A good video of these pandemic simulations:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d3WUv5SV5Hg

I expect China played the role of being the first to implement lockdowns because it was believable an authoritarian country would implement such an extreme policy and because it would help the west accept a less extreme version - it must be necessary look what China is doing and at least it's not as bad as what's happening in China.

Expand full comment

This whole Covid/lockdown/jab abomination sounds like a psyop within a psyop within a psyop!

Expand full comment

Riddle me this, though: if the virus didn't come from a lab, then how else could the gp120 insert and the furin cleavage site have gotten into the virus? Both mutations are naturally foreign to this type of virus. Also, how did Omicron, originally from the reject pile, manage to get such an unusual number of radical mutations in such a short period of time unless there was yet another lab leak (or release) this time in South Africa?

Expand full comment